Of
course, I see positive aspects in many theories of motivation and
believe that implementing a combination of several of them in my
classroom will be the most effective way of reaching all the
students with various levels of intrinsic or extrinsic motivation. To
meet the students’ need for arousal, I could find out what interests
different students and allow them at appropriate times. For example, I
could have 30 minutes of free reading every Friday,
or let students listen to music while they take tests if they want. To
instill self-efficacy in my students, I could begin the semester with
easy topics such as grammar and progressively
move on to more difficult subjects after the students feel competent and
confident in the easy subject. To encourage self-determination, I could
offer many choices; for example, I could have a list of good literature
with a summary and background information
so students can individually choose what sounds interesting to do a book
report on. Maslow’s Theory of Hierarchy of Needs was also helpful in
aiding me to break down the different facets of needs that must be
addressed when I think about motivating my students.
Finally, the focus on having students create goals was particularly
instructive. In high-school, I remember my swim coach’s most effective
tool in motivating me was to get me to physically write down goals I had
for the next meet, by the end of the month, and
by the end of the season. There
was nothing more enjoyable than meeting a goal, and nothing more
motivating than just missing a goal. These were examples of performance
goals, but I
have also experienced mastery goals by being proud of myself for
understanding a concept or achieving a level of knowledge about a topic.
I would like to be intentional about having my students and I join in a
contract of goals so that I may keep them accountable
and can celebrate with them when goals are achieved.
No comments:
Post a Comment