The article that I
read in place of Ormrod’s Chapter 4 was “Critical Race Theory, Multicultural
Education, and the Hidden Curriculum of Hegemony,” by Michelle Jay. I was
immediately captivated by her approach, especially since I have just gotten a
grasp on Critical Race Theory through a couple of English classes I took last
semester. As a high school student, I was always quick to pick up on the fact
that every textbook inevitably had a diverse sampling of people from different
ethnicities and races scattered throughout its pages in forms of images,
personal narratives or blips, or other perspective-giving means. Through this
article, I began to wonder for the first time: is that enough? Multicultural
education is defined by Jay as having goals “to reduce prejudice and
discrimination against oppressed groups, to work toward equal opportunity and
social justice for all groups, and to effect an equitable distribution of power among members of different
cultural groups” (3, italics mine). Does the multicultural education we
implement in schools distribute power
to minority groups—whether based on race, class, gender, or culture? If
multicultural education rather simply attempts to spread tolerance or “just
getting along,” then the status quo remains, which in turn means that a
hegemony exists: white males still have a larger share of the power. It seems
harsh to put it like that, but I believe it to be so. Jay is not surprised by
this fact, for she admits that “transformative knowledge,” or putting
multicultural education into action, “is dangerous. It threatens those dominant
groups in our society who have a vested interest in the… maintenance of
dominant structures, long-present inequalities, and the current power
arrangements” (5).
How can I as a
teacher bring about change? I may be unusual, for I will (hopefully) be working
in a school where the minority groups are the majority. Of course this does not
mean I will not encounter prejudice from dominant groups; indeed, every day I
imagine I will be combating stereotypes against whites, or perhaps a student
who is poorer or has a parent in jail, or “blacker” students than others, or
even a student of a different religion or cultural background. One stereotype I
am especially passionate against combating is that “to be intelligent is to be
white.” This is perhaps its own hegemony—that to succeed in a “white world” would
somehow “acting white.” Instead, I want to instill great pride in my students’
background and race, so that they are confident enough to work through the
hegemony of the “white world” they inevitably live in.
